Surface finishing is a critical step in manufacturing medical devices, especially for titanium alloys used in implants and surgical tools like forceps,scalpels,artificial knee joints, and vascular stents. A flawless surface reduces bacterial adhesion, enhances biocompatibility, and ensures long-term performance. This article explores electropolishing and mechanical vibratory polishing, two leading automated techniques, focusing on their technical distinctions, cost implications, and suitability for titanium-based medical applications.
Titanium alloys (e.g.,Ti-6Al-4V) are favored for their high strength-to-weight ratio,corrosion resistance, and biocompatibility. However, surface defects like micro-scratches or contamination can lead to inflammation or implant failure. Automated polishing ensures uniformity and precision, meeting ISO 13485 and FDA standards
Electropolishing is an electrochemical process where the titanium workpiece acts as an anode immersed in a specialized electrolyte (e.g., acidic solutions). A controlled DC current selectively dissolves surface micro-protrusions, achieving a mirror-like finish with roughness (Ra) as low as 0.1–0.4 μm
l Superior Surface Quality: Eliminates micro-cracks and burrs, ideal for intricate geometries (e.g., vascular stents)
l Enhanced Corrosion Resistance: Forms a passive oxide layer, critical for implants
l Batch Processing: High throughput for mass production
l High Initial Cost: Requires expensive equipment (rectifiers, temperature-controlled tanks)
l Chemical Waste Management: Electrolyte disposal poses environmental challenges
l Limited Geometric Flexibility: Less effective for internal channels or ultra-thin walls
Mechanical vibratory polishing uses abrasive media (ceramic, plastic, or steel beads) in a vibrating container. The tumbling action physically grinds the titanium surface, achieving Ra values of 0.2–0.8 μm
l Lower Equipment Cost: Basic machinery and reusable media
l Flexibility: Handles complex parts like artificial knee joints
l No Chemical Hazards: Environmentally safer
l Surface Inconsistencies: Risk of uneven polishing or edge rounding
l Labor-Intensive: Requires frequent media changes and manual inspection
l Material Removal: May alter critical dimensions of thin-walled devices
| Parameter | Electropolishing | Mechanical Vibratory Polishing |
| Surface Roughness (Ra) | 0.1–0.4 μm | 0.2–0.8 μm |
| Geometric Complexity | Limited | High |
| Material Removal Rate | 5–20 μm/min | 2–10 μm/min |
| Environmental Impact | Chemical waste | Dust/particulate emissions |
| Initial Equipment Cost | 50,000–200,000 | 10,000–50,000 |
l Electropolishing: High-cost items include rectifiers (30k–80k) and fume scrubbers (25k–50k)
l Mechanical Polishing: Lower upfront costs, with vibratory bowls priced at 18k–40k
| Factor | Electropolishing | Mechanical Polishing |
| Labor | Low (automated) | High (manual media handling) |
| Consumables | Electrolyte (50–200/L) | Abrasive media (5–20/kg) |
| Energy | 10–30 kWh/batch | 5–15 kWh/batch |
l Electropolishing: Achieves sterile-grade surfaces with Ra <0.3 μm, critical for infection control
l Mechanical Polishing: Cost-effective for prototypes but may require post-process cleaning
l Electropolishing: Removes micro-burrs from laser cutting, preventing thrombosis
l Mechanical Polishing: Risks damaging thin struts (thickness <100 μm)
Electropolishing excels in high-precision applications like vascular stents, where surface integrity is non-negotiable. Mechanical vibratory polishing suits cost-sensitive projects with simpler geometries, such as artificial knee prototypes. A hybrid approach (e.g., mechanical pre-polishing + electropolishing) may optimize cost and quality for dental forceps
We offer complimentary polishing trials to verify surface quality before bulk orders. Submit your requirements through our website and receive a customized report within 12 hours.
E-mail : info@surface-polish.com
Réseau IPv6 pris en charge 
+86-592-2381506 